Master H.Vlieland from Rotterdam to Havre le Grace , is while he was hunted by a privateer,fled to Boulogne but was captured there by another privateer and totally foundered.
Utrechtsche courant
29-01-1798
more information in an older post wich we copy
Hendrik Aldertszoon Vlieland
Hendrik Aldertszoon Vlieland was born 28-01-1748 Noordwijk Holland.
He is the son of Aldert Vlieland and Maartje Langeveld.
Married to Marijtje Arrishoek. and they had two children Aldert named after his father and Cornelis after her father .
To avoid the wars between French and England he was a burgher of Prussia and subject of the count of Knipshausen.
He was in 1797 with his ship "de jonge Elisabeth "on a journey from Rotterdam to Havre de Grace when he was captured by the aKingsship "the Harpy" Master Henry Bazely, esquire.
He was brought to the ship and because of the big waves, lost sight of his ship.
he was landed in Dover and went straight to Phineas Kennets to report what had happened.
Later he learned that parts of his ship where beached in Noordwijk and the parts were recognised by him as well as by Maarten Kruijt mayor of Noordwijk and by Jan de Booy blacksmith.
The crew however was lost and never heard of since .His son Aldert(18)among them.
The wifes and mothers of the lost crewmembers made a declaration in Noordwijk about the loss of the "jonge Elisabeth"
Date August 20, 1798 January standing before me Jan Gerard Crameris, secretary and Jan Hoekman and Job van der Weijden, sheriffs of both Northern Districts, and Langeveld Offem: Marijtje Arrishoek, wife of Hendrik Vlieland, Annetje van Duin, wife of Zacharias de Jong, Aaltje Dirkx van Duin, wife of Dirk Pietersz. Balkenende, residing on the first and third in Noordwijk aan Zee and the second to Catwijk aan Zee, which claimed the benefit of all whom this would by no allowed to enter and serve each other when necessary and that her sons in quality as the first captain and her son Aldert Vlieland and the two men also his companions on "de jonge Elisabeth", which was reported last seen in the month of October or beginning of the month November 1797 in Rotterdam and that the English King Ship according to testimony of the first witness husband was Hendrik Vlieland taken deposantes and her first husband was repatriated and all the other men were gone and never heard off. So that they true and also truly believe it to be on the grounds that they witnesses to this day and the best of knowledge of life or residence of their men and son .Despite all efforts and searches that have been obtained.
Being witnesses they are prepared to swear an oath to confirm.
In 1804 he has another ship "den Aufwaerter" which he likes to lie in shelter from enemy ships in Katwijk innerharbour.
The whole story (translated by google)is below.
The Town Board of the two northern districts, and Langeveld Offem to the Council of the Navy of the Batavian Republic Citizens
Immediately after the reception of your Circular of the December 30 1.1. We summoned the Accountants in Noordwijk aan Zee and informed them of the charge contained in Circular reported, which is to comply within the stipulated time then, since we are informed that of the four barges in sending our letter of the December 9 1.1. still located in the Schuitengat, since three of which the one named de jonge Elisabeth, before having belonged to Arie van der Schoneveld and envisages three years belonging to Frederick Jongbloed to Papenburg and conducted by Pieter Vink, one called the jonge Johannis having belonged to Jan Gijze Zonneveld belonging to three years Johannis Nieuwenhoven to Embden and conducted by Thomas Vink called the Mary, having belonged to Jan Gijzen Zonneveld, since three years owned Hille Bouwerman and Son Construction Embden and conducted by Jan Moeijenkind if meantime gone to Rotterdam. The bet. Claas Waasdorp, owner of the remaining one boat called the jonge Pieter master Jan Kaak, invites us to want them in your favor to ask this barge as deeply as possible and at the end of the Schuitengat located, since at this point so she and the other co-owners claimed was out of sight of the enemy, then the boats at Scheveningen and Catwijk, at the point where it lies now lies to stay put. We the Bookkeeper can not refuse this request to barge into the Schuitengat to leave again for you to carry, especially since it raised it so. Furthermore, we had tidings that some days ago, arrived at our beach and in the Schuitengat has settled a bomschuit called the Aufwaerdter, to which is skipper and owner Henrik Vlieland now resident and citizen of the Earl of Knipshausen under Act of 1803 dated 5 July, as shown to us even today on the beach is now a new bomschuit carpentry and finished within few days by the shipwright M.Kruijt for the account of Fa to Papenburq Jongbloed, and us with you to inquire whether these two boats are not allowed to leave there. Again, is intended to satisfy your gem. Circular that the name of the boat which according to our letter of the December 9 1.1. ready gone, and the jonge Arie was saled in Dordrecht on behalf of the French Government, and that the precise dato of transitions of this property of the shipowner said barges were forgotten
Members of the Town Board
(signed) Cramerus Noordwijk January 4, 1804.
Advertentie Rotterdamse courant 05-04-1803we find Jeroen and Hendrik Vlieland in the same advertisment
Naar TOPSHAM, Kaptein Jeroen Vlieland, met het Bomschip de Post van Topsham. Naar HAVRE en CAAN, Kaptein Hendrik Vlieland, met hét Bomsbhip de Jonge Elizabeth. Naar BAYONNE .
He is the son of Aldert Vlieland and Maartje Langeveld.
Married to Marijtje Arrishoek. and they had two children Aldert named after his father and Cornelis after her father .
To avoid the wars between French and England he was a burgher of Prussia and subject of the count of Knipshausen.
He was in 1797 with his ship "de jonge Elisabeth "on a journey from Rotterdam to Havre de Grace when he was captured by the a
He was brought to the ship and because of the big waves, lost sight of his ship.
he was landed in Dover and went straight to Phineas Kennets to report what had happened.
Later he learned that parts of his ship where beached in Noordwijk and the parts were recognised by him as well as by Maarten Kruijt mayor of Noordwijk and by Jan de Booy blacksmith.
The crew however was lost and never heard of since .His son Aldert(18)among them.
The wifes and mothers of the lost crewmembers made a declaration in Noordwijk about the loss of the "jonge Elisabeth"
Date August 20, 1798 January standing before me Jan Gerard Crameris, secretary and Jan Hoekman and Job van der Weijden, sheriffs of both Northern Districts, and Langeveld Offem: Marijtje Arrishoek, wife of Hendrik Vlieland, Annetje van Duin, wife of Zacharias de Jong, Aaltje Dirkx van Duin, wife of Dirk Pietersz. Balkenende, residing on the first and third in Noordwijk aan Zee and the second to Catwijk aan Zee, which claimed the benefit of all whom this would by no allowed to enter and serve each other when necessary and that her sons in quality as the first captain and her son Aldert Vlieland and the two men also his companions on "de jonge Elisabeth", which was reported last seen in the month of October or beginning of the month November 1797 in Rotterdam and that the English King Ship according to testimony of the first witness husband was Hendrik Vlieland taken deposantes and her first husband was repatriated and all the other men were gone and never heard off. So that they true and also truly believe it to be on the grounds that they witnesses to this day and the best of knowledge of life or residence of their men and son .Despite all efforts and searches that have been obtained.
Being witnesses they are prepared to swear an oath to confirm.
In 1804 he has another ship "den Aufwaerter" which he likes to lie in shelter from enemy ships in Katwijk innerharbour.
The whole story (translated by google)is below.
The Town Board of the two northern districts, and Langeveld Offem to the Council of the Navy of the Batavian Republic Citizens
Immediately after the reception of your Circular of the December 30 1.1. We summoned the Accountants in Noordwijk aan Zee and informed them of the charge contained in Circular reported, which is to comply within the stipulated time then, since we are informed that of the four barges in sending our letter of the December 9 1.1. still located in the Schuitengat, since three of which the one named de jonge Elisabeth, before having belonged to Arie van der Schoneveld and envisages three years belonging to Frederick Jongbloed to Papenburg and conducted by Pieter Vink, one called the jonge Johannis having belonged to Jan Gijze Zonneveld belonging to three years Johannis Nieuwenhoven to Embden and conducted by Thomas Vink called the Mary, having belonged to Jan Gijzen Zonneveld, since three years owned Hille Bouwerman and Son Construction Embden and conducted by Jan Moeijenkind if meantime gone to Rotterdam. The bet. Claas Waasdorp, owner of the remaining one boat called the jonge Pieter master Jan Kaak, invites us to want them in your favor to ask this barge as deeply as possible and at the end of the Schuitengat located, since at this point so she and the other co-owners claimed was out of sight of the enemy, then the boats at Scheveningen and Catwijk, at the point where it lies now lies to stay put. We the Bookkeeper can not refuse this request to barge into the Schuitengat to leave again for you to carry, especially since it raised it so. Furthermore, we had tidings that some days ago, arrived at our beach and in the Schuitengat has settled a bomschuit called the Aufwaerdter, to which is skipper and owner Henrik Vlieland now resident and citizen of the Earl of Knipshausen under Act of 1803 dated 5 July, as shown to us even today on the beach is now a new bomschuit carpentry and finished within few days by the shipwright M.Kruijt for the account of Fa to Papenburq Jongbloed, and us with you to inquire whether these two boats are not allowed to leave there. Again, is intended to satisfy your gem. Circular that the name of the boat which according to our letter of the December 9 1.1. ready gone, and the jonge Arie was saled in Dordrecht on behalf of the French Government, and that the precise dato of transitions of this property of the shipowner said barges were forgotten
Members of the Town Board
(signed) Cramerus Noordwijk January 4, 1804.
Advertentie Rotterdamse courant 05-04-1803we find Jeroen and Hendrik Vlieland in the same advertisment
Naar TOPSHAM, Kaptein Jeroen Vlieland, met het Bomschip de Post van Topsham. Naar HAVRE en CAAN, Kaptein Hendrik Vlieland, met hét Bomsbhip de Jonge Elizabeth. Naar BAYONNE .
No comments:
Post a Comment