Name: Fredk C Petter
Age (Original): 23
Gender: Male
Birth Year: 1858
Birthplace: Tottenham, Middlesex, England
Relationship to Head of Household: Head
Marital Status: Married
Occupation: Commercl Traveller
Address: 220 Brockley Rd
Event Place: St Paul Deptford, Kent, England
Disability:
Record Type: Household
Household Role Gender Age Birthplace
Fredk C Petter Head M 23 Tottenham, Middlesex, England
Marie E Petter Wife F 22 Leamington, Warwickshire, England
Lizzie C Petter Daughter F 4 Stoke Newington, Surrey, England
Fredk C Petter Son M 2 Stoke Newington, Surrey, England
George H Jackson M 15 Islington, Middlesex, England
Georgina M Jackson F 7 Islington, Middlesex, England
A London
commercial traveller in the 1880s and 1890s
Commercial travellers, like Frederick
Charles Petter, had an ambiguous social standing. They were below-average
earners in a peripatetic and insecure profession, but often aspired to be lower
middle class in their lifestyle and the education of their children. By 1881,
Charles Frederick was living with his wife and eldest two children in the
recently built suburb of Brockley in Kent, just outside the London metropolitan
boundary and several rungs up from the more urban Tottenham where he had been
born, and was able to employ two domestic servants. By 1891, with at least nine
family mouths to feed, he seems to have moved closer to the inner city, to
Denmark Hill in Camberwell, another newbuild area but probably cheaper than
Brockley and involving less expense in train travel if he needed to go into
central London: there were cheap workmen’s tickets for regular working
travellers. However, by this time he was able to afford only one person to help
in the house.
A commercial traveller ‘on the road’ took samples,
catalogues or pattern books of the products (tobacco, confectionary, linens,
ladies’ corsetry) of a firm (such as Coats’ draperies, Wills’ tobacco, Wolsey’s
underwear or McVitie’s biscuits) to shopkeepers who might place an order for
the branded goods in which he travelled, perhaps making up to 45 calls a week;
he (it was a very male profession) often also spent ‘wasted’ non-earning days
canvassing for new business in areas off his usual territory. If he travelled
in linens and drapery for firms such as Liberty’s, there would be a very busy
period in the spring and autumn ahead of the new summer and winter fashions,
but then very little work for the rest of the year. Travellers were white-collar
workers, either self-employed and dependent on commission or employed directly
by a company (a traveller employed by Wills’ could earn up to £400 a year). They defined themselves as professionals within
a closed fraternity and needed to be self-confidant in selling both themselves
and their goods and resilient, since much of their territory had to be covered
on foot, omnibus or train in all weathers. They had a professional body, the
United Kingdom Commercial Travellers Association (UKCTA), founded in 1883,
which gave insurance cover against damage to goods or incapacity to work and help
in legal matters, and a School in Wanstead in east London, to ‘feed clothe and
educate the necessitous children of brethren “on the road”’. Travellers might
have a local territory so that they came home every night, but could be away
from home for a week (sometimes even a month), when they stayed in one of a dedicated
network of cheap hotels catering for itinerant guests, some being ‘temperance’
establishments where no alcohol was served. This made domestic life very strained,
with the burden of keeping home and raising the children on a fluctuating
income falling on Marie Elizabeth and a family that grew by a new child more or
less every two years from 1877 to 1890.
Thanks are due to Michael French for some
of this information, drawn from his articles ‘Commercials, careers, and cultures:
travelling salesmen in Britain 1890s–1920s’, History Review 58 (2), 2005, 352–77 and ‘On the road: travelling
salesmen and experiences of mobility in Britain before 1939’, Journal of Transport History 31 (2),
2010, 133–50.